Le Fort I osteotomy as surgical access

Authors

  • Pablo Fulgueiras Specialist in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Member of the buccomaxillofacial surgery service. Central Hospital of the Armed Forces. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-3999
  • Carlos Arismendi Specialist in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Assistant of the specialty in buccomaxillofacial surgery, Graduate School, School of Dentistry, University of the Republic. Montevideo, Uruguay. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-1779

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35954/SM2020.39.2.10

Keywords:

Maxillary Fractures; Odontogenic Cysts; Osteotomy; Osteotomy, Le Fort; Maxillofacial Injuries

Abstract

Multiple surgical approaches have been described for treatment of maxillary lesions. Horizontal osteotomy of the maxilla at the level of the fracture line, as described by Le Fort in 1901, was originally reported as a surgical approach for the resection of nasopharyngeal tumors in 1859. Since the 1970s, this procedure has been popularized in orthognathic surgery for the correction of dentofacial deformities. The Le Fort I type osteotomy was ignored as a surgical approach for several decades, regaining popularity in the late 1980s especially for access to skull base, facial center and nasopharyngeal tumors. The main advantage of this procedure is that it offers a panoramic view of the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity, allows complete exposure and facilitates the complete removal of large lesions without the need for unnecessary extensions and resections of the maxillary bone. We present the case of a maxillary odontogenic keratocyst using the Le Fort I osteotomy as the surgical approach for its treatment.

Recibido para evaluación: Diciembre 2019 Aceptado para publicación: Julio 2020 Correspondencia: Las Heras 1925. C.P.11600. Montevideo, Uruguay. Tel.: (+598) 24873048 interno 171. E-mail de contacto: pablofulgueiras@hotmail.com  

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Drommer RB. The history of the “Le Fort I osteotomy”. J Maxillofac Surg 1986; 14(3):119-2. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0503(86)80275-2.

(2) Bell WH, Fonseca RJ, Kenneky JW, Levy BM. Bone healing and revascularization after total maxillary osteotomy. J Oral Surg 1975; 33(4):253-60. PMID: 1054396

(3) Sailer HF, Haers PE, Grätz KW. The Le Fort I osteotomy as a surgical approach for removal of tumours of the midface. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(99)80002-x.

(4) Speight PM, Takata T. New tumour entities in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck tumours: odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumours. Virchows Arch 2018; 472(3):331-339. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2182-3.

(5) Alstad V, Abtahi J. Surgical removal of keratocystic odontogenic tumours via a Le Fort I osteotomy approach: a retrospective study of there currence rate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46(4):434-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.01.006

(6) Al-Moraissi EA, Dahan AA, Alwadeai MS, Oginni FO, Al-Jamali JM, Alkhutari AS, et al. What surgical treatment has the lowest recurrence rate following the management of keratocystic odontogenic tumor? A larg systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45(1):131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.10.013

(7) Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS. Recurrence probability for keratocystic odontogenic tumors: An analysis of 6427 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.010

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Fulgueiras P, Arismendi C. Le Fort I osteotomy as surgical access. Salud Mil [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 30 [cited 2026 May 26];39(2):80-5. Available from: https://revistasaludmilitar.uy/ojs/index.php/Rsm/article/view/115

Issue

Section

Case Reports

        PlumX Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.